Lie Detection Study

Pawa. Ekta & Strand, Rickard IBPsych-HL/SL What were the aim, procedure and findings from the study? Aim: to see if in that location was a to find a cognitive process which underlies in all types of lying Procedure: The participants were put in an MRI study and were abandoned a playing witticism. The machine then guessed which fluff individually participant was given; every time it guessed secure the participants were back up to lie. What they did not know was that the computer which guessed the broadsheet already knew which card each participant had. Participants were further boost to lie, by get paid more if they could fool the computer. Findings: The findings was that several(prenominal) areas of the brain was nimble during lying such as the prior cingulate cortex which is a small brain structure that looks desire two halves of an apple. It is tough in the processes such paying attention, qualification judgment and inhibiting a persons responses. Fu rthermore the leftfield prefrontal cortex was involved; this area is known to be involved in making inhibitory decisions. Strengths and limitations: The strengths of this study is that it eliminates the chases of casual a polygraph.

A polygraph measures skin temperature and blood pressure which is anticipate to increase in truthful persons when told a lie entirely coldblooded liars can and so fool the test. Also the feeling of pain sensation creates the same reactions from the dead body which wakes it possible to crate dour positives during a test. The strengths of this test then is that its a can harder to cheat the test because you cannot defy the! activity of the brain. Limitations to this is that it is expensive and inactive very cost inefficient, in any case this audition was done in a laboratory and the picture of a court room or a prison rear can alter the results.If you want to get a broad essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper