U. S. Civil Rights Movement 1950-present

Running head : courteous RIGHTSCivil Rights in the joined reasonableness from 1950 to 2006John Q . StudentWright say UniversityCivil Rights in the coupled States from 1950 to 2006One would hope that the arrive together States would comport entered the mid-fifties with the difficulties of discrimination and consort relations behind them . aft(prenominal) either in al ane , the Civil War had been fought and the ordinal , ordinal and Fifteenth Amendments , away righting thrall , prohibiting the infringement of rights without due process and guaranteeing the right to voting to all male citizens singly had been had been passed and ratified early in the reconstruction process . sadly this was not to be the grammatical case personOn January 1 , 1950 the raising schema was largely segregated in areas with a game world of African Americans , the branches of the military had still recently been corporate and Nipponese multitude who were natural in Japan , no issue how long they had lived in the United States and how m any children had been born here into United States citizens were not all the same allowed to apply for citizenship . mountain of African descent were not allowed to arrange their right in the southward to vote due to jacket taxes , literacy tests , and covert at loggerheads accomplish . Throughout the United States living accommodations discrimination prevented nonage citizens from buy houses in segregated areas . The powerful law of the bring was not the above mentioned amendments , all was dedicate on a close handed down by the imperious lawcourt of the United States (SCOTUS fifty-four years preferably in the end of Plessy v . Ferguson . In this case the Supreme Court had upheld a lah State Law that essential railroads to provide cost but separate accommodations for white and faded races and prohibited people from occupying any cars other than the one designated by the railroad (Hall ,. 637-8 .

This law was only one among many Jim rip-shooting laws that existed throughout the South that efficaciously promoted segregation in public places such(prenominal)(prenominal) as restaurants theaters , sports facilities and in education . SCOTUS ruled that such laws was constitutional and that separation of races did not inherently suggest that one race was inferior or treated unfairly . In addition judge chocolate-brown wrote in the majority mentation that laws could not wee-wee the long-established impost of society . He justify his decision based on a long line of SCOTUS decisions beginning with the 1849 case of Roberts v . City of Boston which cerebrate directly to public schools . By making this ruling SCOTUS efficaciously had effectively eliminated the touch on protection clause of the ordinal Amendment in regards to raceIn the 1950s supporters of gibe rights for all races prepared to try Plessy v . Ferguson . On may 17 , 1954 SCOTUS ruled that sequestration of white and Negro children in the public schools of a State solely on the phantom end of race , consistent to state laws permitting or requiring such segregation , denies to Negro children the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment - even though the physiologic facilities and other tangible factors of...If you want to get a full essay, parade it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper