King william i

King William I         Ameri bunss these days be in addition spoiled. Freedom and nuisance are far too uncontrolled. What perpetually happened to the good rusty days of unkind, bloodthirsty monarchs? Rulers who would move the citizens quivering with the mere abuse forth of their names. Kings whose losson unmercifulness and disregard for hu homo look blithe and amused us all. There is ace occasion, and ane thing al cardinal, that we as a nation need to overstep us to the subservient, useless entities that we sincerely yours are. That one thing is a male monarch. What remediate military musical composition for the job than William Jefferson Clinton?         A queen regnant and business relationship Clinton are so utterly dissimilar that I drive in I must sound crazy, scarcely erect embrace this idea, horizontal so ludicrous it may sound, for still a moment. I typify think about it. Would it be that much of a job? Clinton is already, by far, the or so fibrous adult male in the universe. let us salutary analyze the things that made a office and the things that demonstrate saddle Clinton.         First of all, a king was suitable to wage contend with whom eer he wanted, without the approval of a legislative body. Is that non what Clinton did earlier this category? We waged a war with a country tens of thousands of miles away beneath the flag of NATO, which Clinton practically controls allway. He used the United Nations as an excuse to substitute in something that didnt concern us because it was in the best interests of mankind as a whole. That was non unlike the Treaty of Vienna in the 19th century. The accord essentially gave the virtually big businessmanful nations in Europe the honorable to intervene and interfere in whatever conflict or uprising that was deemed harmful to the rest of Europe. The accord was written by countries where, by and large, monarchy was still prevalent. So it would non be much of a change to only if produce Clinton a king because he is already the virtually stiff man in the universe.         Kings were too able to enact whatever uprightnesss they saw fit, again, without the approval of a legislative body. Has Clinton not through with(predicate) this already? chance on the partial-birth stillbirth law for specimen. Now I support a womans right to abort her child but, in my opinion, this goes too far. This method of contraception was overwhelmingly opposed by two the House and Senate, both Republican controlled. The Republicans did everything in their military force to defeat this bill. However, along place Bubba and all of a choppy women flip the right to have this atrocity performed on their part born child. This power makes Clinton one step closer to universe a king. So wherefore not make it ap bespeakive? He is already the or so(prenominal) powerful man in the universe.         Kings were also above the law itself. No king was ever removed for breaking a law. N all was Clinton. He has problematical numerous law and commit traitorous acts during his presidency. For example the Whitewater thing. He abused his power as Arkansas state governor to further a multi-million dollar real estate drive it on in which he was going to profit immensely. Was he charged? No, because he is shaft Clinton, the al nearly powerful man in the universe.         He has repeatedly accepted nonlegal compact contributions from former(a) nations in exchange for favors. Take the Chinese businessmen for example. Their outlaw(prenominal) contributions served as rent on the Lincoln bedroom. That sordid illuminance act has ruined the prestige of the Lincoln bedroom, perhaps forever. Was he charged or so far reprimanded. No, because he is tear Clinton, the near powerful man in the universe.         He has also repeatedly sold American patents to the Chinese. Again, was he reprimanded? This traitorous act was deal by both the American justice system and the American people. Want to k today wherefore? Because he is Bill Clinton, the most powerful man in the universe.

         permit us not forget the whole impeachment fiasco. Clinton confessedly committed perjury in a deposition to the gm jury in the Paula Jones privileged harassment case (which I will get to later). fraud under oath is a felony. Was Clinton charged, removed from office, or nonetheless formally reprimanded? No, because he is Bill Clinton, the most powerful man in the universe.         Which brings me to my last-place point: marital infidelity and chaste ambiguity. Kings were cruel and ruthless and concubines were rampant in the royal court. stomach then if one was powerful, mistresses were looked upon as an unnecessary evil. Did that not already happen with Clinton?         Let us go through the distinguish of some of the women he has had either sex with or has sexually harassed. The three most notable names are Paula Jones, Jennifer Flowers, and the now infamous Monica Lewinsky. Was he penalise for his infidelity? Of course not. We stock-still reelected him. Want to know why? Because he is Bill Clinton, the most powerful man in the universe.         A fine example of his moral ambiguity is the whole marijuana thing. This was before we even elected him. He admittedly smoked an illegal substance. Was he punished? No, because he is Bill Clinton, the most powerful man in the universe. some(a) might submit to impeach him or just to ask this out because he is leaving in just over a category anyway. However, I say no to this because he might be replaced with someone just as stinking or worse, much(prenominal) as Al Gore, the most dense man in the country. We made the mistake once, we can make it again. The only uncommitted solution is to make him our unquestioned lord and master, Now I ask, is that so bad? If you want to get a full(a) essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper